Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients - NeurOptics
20924
wp-singular,portfolio_page-template-default,single,single-portfolio_page,postid-20924,wp-theme-bridge,wp-child-theme-bridge-child,bridge-core-2.8.4,vcwb,qode-page-transition-enabled,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,hide_top_bar_on_mobile_header,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-26.8,qode-theme-bridge,qode_header_in_grid,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.7.0,vc_responsive

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients

 

Download PDF

 

Benjamin Nyholm, Laust Obling, Christian Hassager, Johannes Grand, Jacob Møller, Marwan Othman, Daniel Kondziella, Jesper Kjaergaard

 

PLOS ONE, July, 2022

 

For More Clinical Publications and Scientific Abstracts Evidence

See All Evidence